The US and Radical Islam: Whose Side is Hillary On?

Funny, that the presidential candidate who cannot be trusted was displaying her trust for an Islamic supremacist in the Muslim Brotherhood engaging in taqiyya that by definition cannot be trusted.  Birds of a feather.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time that Hillary betrayed U.S. national interests through her support for radical Islam. This is only a partial list. Who knows what was in those 30,000 State Department emails that she destroyed.

• Hillary Clinton personally approved the policy of formally engaging with the Muslim Brotherhood.

• Mrs. Clinton has been an enthusiastic supporter Muslim Public Affairs Council and president Salam al-Marayati that sought to dominate their fellow Muslims primarily in Egypt, Libya and Syria and subvert the United States and the rest of the Free World with what the Muslim Brotherhood  calls “civilization jihad,” in which radical Muslims infiltrate key positions within the U.S. government and law enforcement to undermine U.S. interests and spread their influence globally.

• Clinton personally overturned standing policy and approved the admission into the United States of one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s top operatives, Tariq Ramadan.

• Clinton played a leading role in developing and executing Obama administration initiatives aimed at bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria.

• Hillary Clinton was personally involved in advancing the Muslim Brotherhood Organization of Islamic Cooperation agenda aimed at prohibiting defamation of Islam.  Clinton subsequently launched and presided over the Istanbul Process to implement the criminalization of such defamation.

• Hillary Clinton’s State Department was involved in shutting down an investigation into the activities of Tablighi Jamaat – the Deobandi “missionary” group out of Pakistan.  Two of the followers were responsible for the jihadist attack in San Bernardino. The chief investigator, Philip Haney, believes that had this investigation not been terminated and all of its data purged, those murders may have been prevented.

All of this is an extension of Obama’s view that making nice to our enemies and giving them everything they want will turn our enemies into friends who no longer want to kill us and spread sharia world-wide.  Instead they will clamor to eat hot dogs with us at ball games.  After all, Obama and Hillary are certain that everything that is bad about the world including radical Islamic terrorism is our fault.

Still, the same questions asked of Obama could be posed to Hillary: “Whose side are you on anyway?”  Are you trying to advance U.S. interests or those of radical Islam?  And if they say that, of course, they are trying to advance US interests, then why do they think they are advancing US interests when everything they have done suggests otherwise.

If the Democrat party has its way, Hillary Clinton will be our next president. This frightening thought prompts us to ask the question again: “Mrs. President, whose side are you on?”

Back in the days when we would confront our enemies and support our allies, Hillary’s enthusiastic support for the Muslim Brotherhood would be viewed as aiding and abetting the enemy – treason. Obama and Hillary get around this by not identifying radical Islam as an enemy even though ISIS threatened to continue jihad until the ISIS flag flies over the White House.  Memo to Obie and Hil: They are not our friends.

Iva Toguri, dubbed Tokyo Rose, an American with Japanese heritage was forced by Japan during World War II to deliver propaganda to our troops in the pacific with radio broadcasts.  After the war she was tried in the US for of treason. If treason is aiding and abetting the enemy then is appears that the actions of Hillary are even more treasonous than the iconic Tokyo Rose.  The name Tokyo Rose is taken so let’s try Jihad Cut Weed.

Let us know if you have others.

Source: Breitbart