United Nations: “Education Increases Threat to Sustainability”


The United Nations has decided that it will no longer necessitate hiding in the shadowy endeavors of Citizen Barack Hussein Obama, but will now be completely out of the closet in reference to its purpose and its means.  Originally, the UN Secretary General would utilize a lot of garbage language designed, as George Orwell put it, for “insincerity” “between one’s real and one’s declared aims.”  It appears that the Leftists in the United Nations have opted out of the insincerity business and decided that from this moment on, they will be telling us exactly what they intend, without going to the trouble of masking the words, or dressing up the language in a cute little bunny costume for the CNN info-readers.

Their newest and most insidious focus yet comes to us in the form of a proposal to scoop up all the children on the planet in a massive and ultra-effective brainwashing operation that will encompass all the nations of the world, rich and poor, industrialized and backwater, with the stated goal of advocating for child “activism” and weaponizing their talents against the very people who have nurtured these young from birth.  It’s referred to as “Agenda 2030” and its perhaps one of the scariest things to come out of the UN in a long while.

Senior leaders of the United Nations gathered recently to continue plotting the future of globalized pseudo-education, which they said must be imposed on every child on the planet to advance the UN’s radical plan for humanity known as “Agenda 2030.” Speakers at the so-called “High-Level Event on Education,” including Muslims and communists, all agreed that UN-led “education” was the key to realizing their globalist goals.

The UN’s controversial agenda, also dubbed the “Sustainable Development Goals” or SDGs, is basically a recipe for global government, technocracy, and socialism. And it includes the UN’s vision of “education” at the heart of it all. Under Agenda 2030, children are described as “critical agents of change” whose “infinite capacities for activism” will be weaponized and channeled by the UN’s “education” schemes into advancing the planetary entity’s vision of the future.

The whole program, and especially the education component, is being justified under the guise of imposing “sustainable development” on the world. And as far as the nebulous, totalitarian concept relates to education, the UN has already made clear that more education is actually a threat to sustainability.

 You heard right.  No need to read it again.  The United Nations is stating outright that they want our children dumber and more naïve than ever before as this will facilitate an easier transition to their prepared place in the world; a place, of course, as designated by the UN, one which ensures that they are feckless, unspirited, and unopinionated children who listen to their U.N. Mommies and Daddies and commit acts of anti-Establishment against their own government.  Student “zombies” is what the aim is and why it’s imperative that the education levels be dumbed-down to a point where they are not freely associating for themselves.  It’s a time-tested (and successful) Regressive tactic used for more than a century in order to keep school children from becoming “too smart.”

“Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes,” explains a UN “toolkit” for global “sustainable” education, which is still posted online at UNESCO’s website. “In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

Beyond that, when speaking of the UN’s “sustainable development” ideology, which was formulated with crucial assistance from the mass-murdering communist dictatorship ruling China, it has become clear that the UN really means population control, central planning, global governance, and other deeply totalitarian schemes. In fact, the UN barely bothers to conceal that anymore.

In Goal 4 of the 17 SDGs, the UN makes clear that its “education” is really indoctrination. For example, the document, which has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate, demands that all children learn not to just accept and submit to “sustainable development,” but to actually “promote sustainable development.” The indoctrination program is also heavy on the UN’s vision of “human rights,” which are essentially the opposite of the God-given rights enshrined in America’s founding documents.

Just the fact that they’ve now felt emboldened to the point that they’re admitting all this philosophy outright should be scary enough to all Americans.  It means that they no longer feel that there’s a threat to their agenda…that the mere mortals in America who want them thrown out of the United States, cannot even get that done, let alone stop a freight train of this magnitude.

When the children are the preferred choice of weapon, the war for the minds of our kids is beyond serious.  This whole business of shaping their thinking process to agree with their dystopic vision of the New World Order is why rejecting this behavior and this agenda is so vital to our own survival.  Honestly, this is of paramount importance to the sovereignty of the nation.  Even if the only choice to make this work is pulling our kids out of school and doing so at home, then it must be a sacrifice you are willing to make.  If the United Nations has its way, homeschooling (as it is in so much of Europe right now) will be illegal and parents who choose to do so will be thrown in prison, as they are in Holland and Germany.

Don’t think for a moment that it isn’t possible.  If you recall, no one thought we would ever be deciding who would live and who would die on Obamacare; yet the very same types of social medicine policies and laws that exist in Great Britain are blocking Chris Gard and Connie Yates from seeking care for their 11-month-old terminally ill baby, Charlie.  The death panels exist and so, too, will this education mandate become reality if we are not vigilant.

Source:  Freedom Project Media



Share

305 Comments

Leave a Reply