There might be those with good intentions who participate in United Nations’ debates and votes, but for the most part, the organization is useless. This is easily demonstrated. It is supposed to be an advocate and force for world peace, yet there have been multiple wars in progress throughout the organization’s existence.
And when it comes down to it, does anyone really believe that if some of the world’s major powers were determined to go to war that a vote by the UN would deter them? Even more ridiculous is the idea that it can force nations to disarm. At best it provides physical space where belligerents can hurl insults at each other with little fear of violence breaking out on the spot.
At worst, it’s a waste of time and money, and provides a false hope to peoples and nations that really would like to live in peace.
It’s current vote on banning nuclear weapons is an excellent example.
More on this vote on page two.
Great ideal! But so hard to endlforce!
Nuclear anything should be ban world wide
like anyone gives a$#%&!@*what you say
THEY THINK MIGHTY BIG OF THEMSELVES….THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO DO….
So, the U.N. is going to put up “Nuclear Weapons Free Zone” signs? And expect terrorist countries to obey? Because the “Gun Free Zone” signs worked so splendidly at getting criminals to obey?
f**k the U.N.
Sounds like a redistribution of military strength,they can p**s off.
Try it punks.
These guys are lame and slow, A town called Chico Calif. banned them back in the 60’s and so far have been 100% successful.
Let’s all turn our nukes in to the UN because they can be trusted right?……… Not