The United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has issued a report critical of the United States practice of detaining would-be immigrants to determine their appropriate status.
What makes this news ironic is that some of the Council members are hardly shining lights of liberty. But its work is typical of the “open borders” bias that infects the United Nations and other globalist organizations as a whole.
For some reason, the fact that the United States still wants to maintain some semblance of sovereignty is offensive to many in the world community today. Considering all the possible places that asylum seekers and refugees would want to go, the good old USA would be at the very top of the list.
On the next page, learn more about some of the Council members and their gross hypocrisy in attacking U.S. human rights and immigration policies. Find out UNHRC’s specific complaints, and how they run counter to common sense.
Jane Olson, what I am saying is that I am active in the system as long as I am alive. But if we do not build tomorrow right now, there might be a shift you would not benefit from.
Jane Olson pay no attention to stupidity!!!
UN CAN’T DEMAND ANYTHING
Screw these people
Un can get the hell out
Mind youre business u.n. you done lost youre power!! Obama’s gone you dont have youre ace in the hole!!
What u n talking about detention.trump send illegal home to their own country
Sorry we are a sovereign national and don’t follow your demands….as does anyone you try to oppress and dictate too!! You’re a do nothing group of World Order and what is needed is for us to defund you and move you to France!
UN needs to find another County to go to; such as Iraq or Africa!!!
Screw the UN and their wants. We don’t need muslim terrorists imported into America, will stay shooting them where there at.