Christiana Figueres, the executive secretary for the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change actually admitted during a news conference this month that the real goal of all the climate change propaganda is to kill off capitalism.
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” Figueres stated.
Figueres even continues and re-iterates the claim by describing such a change as “…the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves…” As if robbing real & privately owned businesses from under owner’ and employee noses can be depicted in such a manner.
With Christiana even holding former president Obama as a ‘shining example as someone tackling global warming’, it really isn’t any wonder that this admission of such a covert strategy continues to help map capitalism’s destruction.
And she doesn’t stop there…
KEEP READING ON PAGE 2:
There is no global warming in 2012 the earth tilted.
We need to have the United nations removed from America and defund them Amen
The hoax that is GW is the new religion of the left…But fear not…And have faith in the only true God… JESUS
Keith, you have blinders on. The 97 pct consensus has been debunked over and over. Research. 15 year pause in global temps defying all noaa and ipcc models and projections. RESEARCH. NASa, IPCC caught manipulating climate data. Research. Stop calling your religion “science.” Suppression of anyone and any data that disagrees with anthropogenic climate change, denial of grants, blackballing of “deniers” is not science at all. It is the opposite. There is NO verifiable evidence that man is the main contributor of global warming.
Shane Edwards Ritz Ashby
Alex, you are simply wrong. There are mountains of evidence supported by the scientific method that display a model that is solidly in opposition to your claims. Calling science a religion only shows your ignorance of the scientific method and completely invalidates anything you say after that.
Your opinion is not how science works, and yelling at the internet will never make you right, it will simply display your ignorance to a much larger audience.
I have researched. I didn’t go in to this with a predetermined outcome. Clearly you need to do a bit more objective research yourself. And science. Read a science book.
http://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.5.8071/full/
Oh – wow – a guy with a degree NOT in climate science disagrees. I am sorry – I was so wrong… Seriously????
Keith, you and your type are the ones who are “simply wrong.” The science of anthropogenic climate change is in NO WAY settled. Anyone who disagrees with the climate change alarmists is labeled a denier and ignorant to the data. As is usual, you and people like you cannot answer simple questions and resort to claiming that those who disagree are against science. There is absolutely not a consensus of 97 pct, there is not one shred of evidence proving man is the driver of climate. Do we contribute? Certainly. Big difference between contributing and implementing policies because of faux science claiming we are the main cause. You are biased 100 percent and fully controlled by your liberal media masters. Quit google searching and thinking that is sufficient research.
Again, science would disagree. There is no point debating this, you are a denier and I have no time to debate a person who refuses to accept science as fact.