GOP frontrunner for the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump, has shown himself to be a master at publicity and self-promotion, often without having to spend money to achieve a dramatic response from the public. While his proclamations are often inflammatory, they also seem to connect with the public and reflect what the average man is thinking.
He began his campaign focusing on illegal immigration and stating clearly that everyone coming into the country must come legally, and those in the country without proper documents must leave. That position seems logical, but the Democrat party is outraged because it threatens their large future voter pool, and establishment Republicans such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and big business are unhappy because it would limit their source of cheap, illegal labor that they have come to depend on.
For middle and lower middle class workers, however, it makes sense because they have seen the impact these illegals have edging them out of the labor market and changing the general makeup of society. And for many it is a simple question of whether we are a nation of laws, or not. For most logical thinkers, the rule of law is what maintains a just and orderly society.
Trump has now issued a new press release, and it has the political and news reporting world on fire. It has even caused the mayor of St. Petersburg, Florida, Rick Kriseman, to declare that Trump is banned from the city because of his views on Muslim immigrants and what should be done about them.
The irony of Kriseman’s position was apparently lost on the mayor. Trump’s view, however, is registering with many people, and his ratings continue to lead the pack by a wide margin, which says that most politicians, including the other Republican presidential hopefuls, are out of touch with the feelings of the American public.
See the video on page 2;
8 US Code 1182
I believe this law has him covered. 8 US Code 1182
http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/ex-muslim-tells-all-about-islam-and-mohamed-and-a-9-yr-old-girl/
Also take a look at 8 US Code 1182
Qe zgould.ban anymore muslims coming over here
The nice muslims will.for not.live
The.other.Islamist.hate.the radical.ones
And. Crazies.are hiding with harmless. Islamist and all.harmless.Islamist are.crazy gor.being.Islamist
Good information Jeremy….the only problem is the two people referenced in this Code ARE THE PROBLEM!
True Steve. Just putting it out there so people will know that Trumps comments are not illegal or unconstitutional and as president he would have full legal (and constitutional) authority to do so.
The Myth:
The Quran places men and women on equal foundation before Allah. Each person is judged according to his or her own deeds. Women have equal rights under Islamic law.
The Truth:
Merely stating that individuals will be judged as such by Allah does not mean that they have equal rights and roles, or that they are judged by the same standards.
There is no ambiguity in the Quran, the life of Muhammad, or Islamic law as to the inferiority of women to men despite the efforts of modern-day apologists to salvage Western-style feminism from scraps and fragments of verses that have historically held no such progressive interpretation.
After military conquests, Muhammad would dole out captured women as war prizes to his men. In at least one case, he advocated that they be raped in front of their husbands. Captured women were made into sex slaves by the very men who killed their husbands and brothers. There are four Quranic verses in which “Allah” makes clear that a Muslim master has full sexual access to his female slaves, yet there is not one that prohibits rape.
The Quran gives Muslim men permission to beat their wives for disobedience, but nowhere does it command love in marriage (although it is said to exist). The verses plainly say that husbands are “a degree above” wives. The Hadith says that women are intellectually inferior, and that they comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants.
Under Islamic law, a man may divorce his wife at his choosing. If he does this twice, then wishes to remarry her, she must first have sex with another man. Men are exempt from such degradations.
Muslim women are not free to marry whom they please, as are Muslim men. Their husband may also bring other wives (and slaves) into the marriage bed. And she must be sexually available to him at any time (as a field ready to be “tilled,” according to the holy book of Islam).
Muslim women do not inherit property in equal portion to males. This is somewhat ironic given that Islam owes its existence to the wealth of Muhammad’s first wife, which would not otherwise have been inherited by her given that she had two brothers and her first husband had three sons.
A woman’s testimony in court is considered to be worth only half that of a man’s, according to the Quran. Unlike a man, she must also cover her head – and often her face.
If a woman wants to prove that she was raped, then there must be four male witnesses to corroborate her account (according to strict Sharia). Otherwise she can be jailed or stoned to death for confessing to “adultery.”
Given all of this, it is quite a stretch to say that men and women have “equality under Islam” based on obscure theological analogies or comparisons. This is an entirely new ploy that is designed for modern tastes and disagrees sharply with the reality of Islamic law and history