Trump Release of Bin Laden Documents Reveals Obama Collusion and Incompetence


Because of the volatility of the information contained in these recovered documents and the potential for a complete contradiction of the Obama administration lies, the information was covered up and carted off to a secure area where they could not be evaluated.  This action made the stunning assumption that no actionable intelligence could possibly be gained from 470,000 documents that may save the lives of our troops in combat in the Middle East and abroad, nor could it provide any further insight (than what we already knew) into the plans of al-Qaeda and other related terror groups and their benefactor nations!

This is the equivalent of being handed the literal location of Osama bin Laden by the Saudi government prior to the World Trade Center bombing when then-President Clinton deferred using this intelligence!

In the weeks following the bin Laden raid, the documents went through an immediate interagency triage for actionable intelligence. That initial scrub yielded valuable information that led to the capture and killing of key al Qaeda associates. But then the documents sat, largely untouched, for months at a time. From that point on, the Obama administration’s interest in the Abbottabad documents didn’t extend much beyond their public relations implications. Simply put, a fuller release of the cache would have fatally undermined the message that al Qaeda had been decimated and that the war on terror was being reduced to a few mopping-up exercises.

As a result, some of the documents were never translated. Relevant intelligence agencies engaged in a protracted fight about who could have access to the information. The Defense Intelligence Agency was repeatedly denied full access by the CIA, which had “executive authority” over the collection and which was run throughout much of the bureaucratic infighting by John Brennan, an Obama crony who had predicted in April 2012 that al Qaeda would meet its demise by the end of the decade.

The U.S. intelligence community never conducted a full-scale review of its own intelligence collection on al Qaeda using the Abbottabad documents. “There was never any kind of evaluation of our work on al Qaeda based on the documents,” says one senior U.S. intelligence official involved with the documents. Obtaining the documents presented an opportunity to check what the intelligence community thought it knew about al Qaeda and its leaders against what actually happened. Who were our good sources? Who was providing misinformation? Was there a source who had better visibility into leadership decision making than we’d assessed? Someone we relied on who wasn’t as important as we’d thought? In some important respects, the bin Laden documents were like the answer key to a test you’d taken. It’s telling that many in the intelligence community didn’t want to review their work or revisit their conclusions.

Worse still, following the success of Operation Shush in which Barack Hussein Obama was reelected, he then repeated shut down attempts by Congressional Republicans to see the rest of the documents.  Finally, in a bid to shut Representative Devin Nunes up, the administration agreed to release the entire cache.  It was at this point that the intelligence community pulled an old Deep State trick and went on television to announce that they were releasing the last of all the trove of documents recovered in the raid and that this would “close the door” on the investigation into Osama bin Laden and what he knew.

They then released 571 documents.  The “most transparent administration in the history of our country” released 571 documents out of 470,000 and claimed this was the last of the information!

Read on the next page about how, despite the Weekly Standard repeatedly requesting clarification on why the intelligence community had been deceitful about their release of the information and, as well, about why they insisted that bin Laden was a broken, old man with a hatred of Iran, the documentation said otherwise!  The response of the officials is staggeringly dishonest!

NEXT PAGE »



Share

291 Comments

  1. Kent
  2. Georgia
  3. Joan Cabany
  4. Christopher G. Morvant
  5. Jack
  6. Truthe
  7. David
  8. John Trites

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest