When Kamel Fotouh from the Katy Islamic Association moved next door to Craig Baker and his 200-year-old family farm, he told Baker he should either pack up his stuff and move or at least get rid of his pigs.
It seems Fotouh also called Baker a liar at a town meeting.
Baker responded by holding pig races every Friday, one of Islam’s most holy days, during their prayer time.
Move to the next page for full story:
Kierston says:
“I think the only reason it comes up as them on there is each time I make a comment it’s letting people see where I’m referring to if they’d like to see where it’s from. I saw it do it a couple times for members as well, but I think it’s just simply for that: to catch people up on what people are talking about in the feed.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/texas-man-holds-pig-races-protest-islamic-neighbors-request-get-rid-pigs/comment-page-46/#comment-564471
GREAT
Chris O’Rear says:
“This is just like someone buying a house next to a baseball field then complaining about the noise and lights. The pig farm was there first and they chose to buy land next to it. Their dumb mistake.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/texas-man-holds-pig-races-protest-islamic-neighbors-request-get-rid-pigs/comment-page-46/#comment-564477
This is just like someone buying a house next to a baseball field then complaining about the noise and lights. The pig farm was there first and they chose to buy land next to it. Their dumb mistake.
Kierston says:
“In the Gospel of Matthew, in the middle of the Sermon on the Mount, just a little after the Beatitudes, Jesus declares that he has not come to abolish the Law or the prophets, but to complete them. He also says that any man who sets aside the least of the Law’s requirements, or teaches others to set them aside, will have the lowest place in the kingdom of Heaven. He then goes on to illustrate the true requirements of the law: not the legalistic interpretation of Mosaic law, nor the religious practices of the Pharisees, but the underlying principles of the law.
Never mind not committing murder; don’t even harbor anger. Don’t pursue your grievances but make peace. Come to terms with those who make demands on you; don’t wait for a judge. Never mind not committing adultery; don’t even harbor lust. If something makes you harbor anger, or pursue grievances, or harbor lust, cast it from you. And so on. More preaching of this kind runs through Matthew 5, 6, and 7.
Elsewhere in Matthew he disparages the Mosaic law as practiced by the Pharisees in his day. He dismisses regulations governing the Sabbath; he dismisses the dietary laws; he states that Moses was wrong to permit writs of divorce. He echoes Hillel in saying that the two greatest commandments are to love God and neighbor; and he also echoes Hillel in saying that the whole of the Law and the Prophets is to treat others as we would like others to treat us.
Did Jesus banish the old testament laws? No: he illustrated a much more difficult, higher law, and set aside the silly religious regulations.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/texas-man-holds-pig-races-protest-islamic-neighbors-request-get-rid-pigs/comment-page-46/#comment-564486
awesome keep it up…
Kierston go preach some where else. The Muslims were wrong point blank the end of this now. Shut up.
Is someone a little butt hurt now?
Go eat an American dick you Islamic $#%&!@*s!
Wow @ Kierston’s quotes…she obviously didn’t learn her or research her facts about Sikhs.
Sikhs are HINDU’s from INDIA. Muslims are NOT from India but from the middle east where ISLAM is practice. A person cannot be Islamic/Muslim and Sikh at the same time as the religious ideologies are vastly different. Sikh’s cannot stand Islam or Muslims which is why you don’t hear too much of it in India. Very few Muslims are allowed in India.
Also Kierston before quoting Bible scriptures you might want to educate yourself. You would be best if you didn’t quote erroneously of the Bible about what it says about eating pig/pork/swine. Christ said it isn’t what we eat that defiles us, it’s how we think, act, and treat others that defiles us.
Actually I just looked more into it and yes, I was wrong on the Sikh comment. However we were both wrong in that aspect, Sikhs consider themselves neither Hindu nor Muslim but apparently they want their own separation of the Indian state because they feel that their regime is too “bent from labeling them part of the Hinduism.” There are arguments on both sides of your stance on it, but from what I keep finding most Sikh consider themselves away from the Hindu religion. Also, the muslim population is the third largest growing population in India, so that wasn’t correct either.
If you’d like to correct my standing on the bible, please do so. I was raised Christian but have since stopped going. What passages am I looking for?
Kierston says:
“That’s the end of your debate tactic? I thought this would be a decent conversation for a while. I’m not saying that there cases where Muslim and any other religious person get into their disputes. You’re right, no one should be able to push another person from their property, hell that’s John Locke’s main theory of politics. However; generalizing a population and saying “in our own country” is a little harsh. You’re just feeding into a perpetual foreigner stereotype and saying that no matter how long they’re in this country, they’ll never be an American. “In God We Trust” but religious freedom is an American right as well. But goodbye, there’s no hope for a discussion with you I suppose.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/texas-man-holds-pig-races-protest-islamic-neighbors-request-get-rid-pigs/comment-page-46/#comment-564500