Repealing the Second Amendment would seemingly be an impossible task. But the left will not so easily give up.
But if the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges teaches us anything, it’s that the age of judicial supremacy means that five justices can amend the Constitution far more efficiently than Congress and the state legislatures. And right now there are clearly four Supreme Court justices who are committed to the absurd view that the operative clause of the Second Amendment — “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” — doesn’t actually mean “the right of the people” and therefore doesn’t encompass an individual right to own a weapon, even for self-defense. More of this theory on the next page:
I feel angry and sorrowful. So many of you posting on here wish to blame labels. REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS, ILLEGALS, MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANS, ETC… Are you all so blind. We are all the same. We all want the same. We are not the enemy. Stop and think. If for but a second. Who would be threatened by a well armed populace? Is it the illegal immigrant families working to provide a life for their kids? Is it the Republican family down the street? The Muslims in the community trying to find their place in our society? NO… None of them are your true enemy. The ones that want to disarm us are the rich and powerful. The slave owners of our society. Wishing to unarm the slaves before they unite and revolt. Wake up people. Try looking beyond your noses. See the big picture. Or we all are doomed because of our arrogance.
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7: “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”
* This applies to judges and justices appointed under Article III of the Constitution, which includes those who serve on US District Courts, US Courts of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court, as well as certain courts of limited jurisdiction. Judges appointed under Article I, who mainly deal with the interaction between the public and departments or functions of the government (such as Social Security Disability Appeals), are removed by a different process.
http://www.answers.com/Q/Who_can_impeach_and_remove_federal_judges_and_Supreme_Court_justices
If they are Americans they will not do away with our 2nd amendment.
I thought American people had to approve addition or removal of an amendment to the constitution!? Article V of the Constitution outlines how to amend (modify) the document. It consists of two steps: proposal and ratification.
1. Propose An Amendment
Either Congress or the States can propose an amendment ot the Constitution.
Both Houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
Two-thirds of the State legislatures must call on Congress to hold a Constitutional Convention.
2. Ratify An Admendment
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
Three-fourths of the State legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition (21st Amendment).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2543298/posts
uh, you cannot say something actually in the Constitution is not Constitutional…. Or can you?
You can’t repeal the 2nd amendment anyway because it’s protected under the 9th amendment. It’s unalienable right/ natural law
The Supreme Court is there to inforce the laws on the books. They cant amend, change or make laws. I wish the supreme court would tell obama what he do. But beings all thos activist that obama appointed with no resistance from congress is try8ng to pull all this c**p.
Amendments have to be ratified or repealed by 2/3 or the States….
Traitors