For Americans who support law enforcement and trust them to safeguard both their liberties and their well-being, it is disheartening to hear officers say that the way to protect the latter is by curtailing the former.
San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia is one such officer, as he revealed in an interview with San Jose Inside. Asked about the topics of the day, Garcia not only expressed support for the controversial Black Lives Matter movement, but also voiced opposition to laws allowing Americans to own firearms for their protection.
As one might be wont to point out, a majority of law enforcement officers believe that Americans should retain the right to bear arms, meaning that Garcia is clearly in the minority on the issue. However, his position as chief of police for the 10th largest city in the country means that his opinion will carry weight among the uninformed and be cited by liberals as support for their anti-gun agenda.
Read more on the next page:
We need more control over idiots like this that get put in office.
I wholeheartedly support the Police, but this jackass needs to be demoted and replaced as Chief!!! He also needs to do more research on BLM!!! As far as a lot of them are concerned, white people all need to be gone!!!
Enforce the laws we currently have….we don’t need more.
The San Jose probably live chief can kiss my$#%&!@* If he can’t obey the supreme law of the land (the Constitution” then he needs to find another job.
There is not enough Enforcement of the Law is the real reason fir gun violence. If the punishment for gun violence by criminals as severe enough it would stop. Kind of like stealing a horse was a hanging offense in the old West.
how did someone so clueless get to be a police chief?
Okay chief, we get it. Thanks for having our backs Judas!
This guy must be having a brain fart.
I know several Scottsdale and Phoenix police officers. Each one has told me that they would be happy if more people (properly trained, of course) carried concealed.
This is exactly why Kalifornia needs to be a “shall issue” state as opposed to “may issue”.
Our constitutional rights should not be at the whim of one individual.