For Americans who support law enforcement and trust them to safeguard both their liberties and their well-being, it is disheartening to hear officers say that the way to protect the latter is by curtailing the former.
San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia is one such officer, as he revealed in an interview with San Jose Inside. Asked about the topics of the day, Garcia not only expressed support for the controversial Black Lives Matter movement, but also voiced opposition to laws allowing Americans to own firearms for their protection.
As one might be wont to point out, a majority of law enforcement officers believe that Americans should retain the right to bear arms, meaning that Garcia is clearly in the minority on the issue. However, his position as chief of police for the 10th largest city in the country means that his opinion will carry weight among the uninformed and be cited by liberals as support for their anti-gun agenda.
Read more on the next page:
Moron
Socialist dumbass! Asshat democrat drinking camel p**s!
Smh! This tool of a “Chief”, doesn’t understand they need criminal control, not gun control!
How can you support Police that want to take away your rights
Seems like every terrible idea comes from California. I am hoping that since California wants to be a sanctuary state it automatically needs more guns for the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. I would much rather allow California to secede. They do not want to follow the constitution and want their own laws. If they secede it would go a long way to balancing the budget since they are by far the largest welfare state in the country. Please MR PRESIDENT allow them to secede when the time comes. A very quick way to deport 8 million illegals.
This guy is a freakin idiot…
Can we take his guns away from him. That would solve problems
You know San Jose IS in California
“Chief Garcia: It’s a very important amendment, and obviously very polarizing. I agree with the right to bear arms, but I equally believe in the limitations that have been placed by our courts. One aspect that I find interesting is that the Second Amendment was adopted in the late 1700s. I wonder if today’s modern weaponry were available then, if that amendment would look the same. I suspect not.”
********************
I suspect the Second would read like this: “No CITIZEN shall be denied the right to own firearms. There shall be NO restrictions place on this Right.”
There are “absolutely” too many San Jose police chiefs.