If a white person were to say that Islamic views on Christians and Jews were barbaric and cruel, they would most-likely be called intolerant, racist (can that even be applied to religion?), or bigoted.
White people really can’t win any argument that involves race, sexuality, or religion. If somebody who practices Islam, on the other hand, were to express some views on Christians and Jews that seemed barbaric and cruel, not only would they not be reprimanded for it, but they would have a majority of liberal Americans agreeing with them.
Take Abu Ammaar Yasi Kazi for example. He’s not some crazy Islamist from the Middle East. He’s a college professor at Rhodes College in Memphis, TN. He’s also been described by the New York Times Magazine as one of the most “influential conservative clerics in American Islam”. Well how about you watch the video on the next page and make that decision for yourself. Apparently the liberal media is even changing the definition of the word “conservative”.
See the video on the next page.
Loveta Joann Ogden , Flashback: Roosevelt Bans “Entire Mohammedan World” From Immigrating to USA
This is when we Presidents with ” Steel Spines & Loved the American Citizen & Common Sense & Logic ” ……now we have ” oval office sitters ” that are ” Socialist , greedy,Treasonous, criminal, non-American white/black trash with their own AGENDA’s ” , unlike this man here …..President Theodore Roosevelt who did this instead of bring them here to ” rape / kill ” us !!!,————————————–>Flashback: Roosevelt Bans “Entire Mohammedan World” From Immigrating to USA
The leftist media would have you believe that Donald Trump is too reactionary, too racist, and too xenophobic to become president, and they usually point toward Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim aliens to prove their point. (Trump has since changed his ban to a restriction on any individual coming to the United States from a country compromised from terrorism.) Unfortunately, history is at odds with the left’s claims.
President Theodore Roosevelt, also a Republican, signed a bill that banned practicing Muslims from entering the United States after he won the election in 1904. He won that election with 336 electoral votes, 190 more than his challenger, Alton B. Parker.
Sure, times have changed in the past hundred years, but polling data suggests that Trump’s ban, even in its most controversial form, was supported by the majority of the United States. It’s another fact that the mainstream media conveniently forgets when attacking the GOP nominee.
See details on Roosevelt’s implicit ban on the next page:
Donald Trump came under fire late last year when he proposed a ban on immigration by foreign aliens — but he’s not the first person to do so. In fact, it was done by a sitting president.
A hundred years ago, Muslims were furious over an immigration bill whose origins lay with advocacy by a headstrong and loudmouthed Republican in the White House.
The anti-immigration bill offended the Ottoman Empire, the rotting Caliphate of Islam soon to be defeated at the hands of America and the West, by banning the entry of “all polygamists, or persons who admit their belief in the practice of polygamy.”
This, as was pointed out at the time, would prohibit the entry of the “entire Mohammedan world” into the United States.
And indeed it would.
The battle had begun earlier when President Theodore Roosevelt had declared in his State of the Union address back in 1906 that Congress needed to have the power to “deal radically and efficiently with polygamy.” The Immigration Act of 1907, signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt, had banned “polygamists, or persons who admit their belief in the practice of polygamy.”
It was the last part that was most significant because it made clear what had only been implied.
The Immigration Act of 1891 had merely banned polygamists. The newest law banned anyone who believed in the practice of polygamy. That group included every faithful believing Muslim.
Newest Power Houses Empires Cleanse Master Deportation Attorney
Deportation illegal immigrants Deporting illegal immigrants Federal tax form First Person Newest Power Houses Empires Cleanse Master Deportation Attorney Deportation illegal immigrants Deporting illegal immigrants Federal tax form First Person Newest Power Houses Empires Cleanse Master Deportation Attorney Deportation illegal immigrants Deporting illegal immigrants Federal tax form First Person
The left seems to have forgotten this piece of legislation when attacking Trump’s credibility. While they’d likely relish any opportunity to attack a Republican — even one from a hundred years ago — it doesn’t serve their immediate goals. They don’t seem to care about principle, they only want to destroy Trump and send Hillary Clinton to the White House.
yes I can say he and his kind are racists and filthy lower than a snake animal. , and I have the 2nd amendment to back me up. and if that s.o.g. came after one of my girls. he would meet that 2nd.
The ones that are not having sex with the goats are filthy?
We going to sort u and ur friends out.chop chop
Why is this filth still employed by the college??!!!
You ever smell a muslim? Like a gut wagon, pigs
He needs to be airdropped in the Middle East don’t worry about his parachute he’s got Allah on his side!
Sick
Just like anyone else. .some People are peaceful, some are not in any race ,culture or religion. U got to go individual, is like saying “everybody in Louisiana is a racist ,backward poorly educated hillbilly n belongs to the KKK”
Not razonable to generalize.