Albert N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the U.S. Army and commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.
When it comes to both speaking about and respecting the horrific tragedy that unfolded on 9/11, nobody is his parallel.
In this jaw-dropping interview, he shares exactly what he thinks really happened that day. And it’s not what you’ve been told.
His perspectives as an insider familiar with the military give a very different perspective than what played out on television screens across the world.
And why might you ask? Why is the man who dropped to his knees in horror that day, revisiting the narrative to say his piece on the truth?
Major General Stubblebine outlined the heartbreaking truth in an explosive interview that it is ludicrous for any intelligent military intelligence commander to take the official 9/11 narrative as a viable explanation for what occurred on Sept. 11th, 2011. And furthermore, that they do not.
More on the next page, and this official interview,
Unfortunately, many people saw the first plane go into the first tower, my husbands college friend (her coworker pointed out the plane as it flew into the tower from their office accross the way) they all thought it was a horrible accident. But as they all stood there at the windows discussing the caos and what they should do or not do, they saw the second plane fly into the second tower. Many many people saw the planes fly into the towers. The people who reported seeing the plane flying over their heads into the Pentagon said it sounded and looked like a Plane. Also, anyone with a science background, my husband has a Ph.D in Physics and a Masters in Chemical Engineering, will tell you that yes, it definately was hot enough to take down the towers and destroy it all. Just because its the first time you saw it happen does not mean it was some conspiracy.
Israel
Dennis Murphy Not hardly but nice try at deflecting. Building number 7 was a controlled demolition? Nice try again, but I used to work around explosives and they leave numerous telltale signs after a demolition event. So where is the evidence of that? Chemical residue, fuses, caps, etc? That’s right. There is none. Must have been that new explosive, that leaves no trace what so ever. Isn’t that convenient. I think that maybe I am not the one living a lie. Care to guess who is living the lie?
Ok Max Bente. So my friend who spoke to her mother right before her flight took off as the senior flight attendant in UN 175, is where. The flight attendant who was on the phone with UN and described Kathy being killed with the pilots is where, that plane is where? The dna found and returned to family members got there how? There were planes and more than likely other devices because it makes sense and there is evidence. Every day civilians died that day in planes and on the ground. And I have the same story about the planes both at the pentagon and the towers from multiple people who were underneath and close to the planes when they hit. These people dont know each other and their stories are the same. There is no reason to not believe that both the plane and devices caused the destruction and deaths.
Guess people were seeing things when they witnessed the plane hit. Must have all been high. Lol what a damn joke!
I find this hard to believe as I watched the second plane hit the towers.
This is a$#%&!@*Off post.
Old and senile does not prove anything. Conspiracy theories will always be around.
Also, of it was a missile, where is the residue or bits of the missile that inevitably get blown clear of the impact crater? Where would it have been launched from? Radar would have shown a distinctive difference between a jet and or a missile. Yet no one has spoken up, not the military, nor any civilian air traffic controllers. Hmmm.
Hey I have bridges for sale. No. No conspiracy dummys!