Investigative journalist and writer on the radical left and Islamic terrorism, Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, Daniel Greenfield, has a fascinating theory as to what was really behind Susan Rice’s deceptive behavior under the Obama administration.
But first, we have to understand why they claimed they had the right to spy on people and foreign leaders.
After months of denials, the pretext for Susan Rice’s eavesdropping on Trump officials has finally been made public. It had been widely known that Obama’s former National Security Adviser had contrived to unmask the names of top Trump officials who had been spied on by the administration. And the same media that still treats Watergate as the Great American Scandal had claimed that there was nothing “improper” in an Obama loyalist eavesdropping on members of the opposition party.
Every time Obama Inc. was caught eavesdropping on opposition politicians, it presented its spin in a carefully packaged “scoop” to a major media outlet. This time was no different.
When Obama Inc. spied on members of Congress to protect its Iran nuke sellout, it packaged the story to the Wall Street Journal under the headline, “U.S. Spy Net on Israel Snares Congress”. The idea was that Obama Inc. was “legitimately” spying on Israel, that it just happened to intercept the conversations of some members of Congress and American Jews, and that the eavesdropping somehow meant that its victims, Jewish and non-Jewish, rather than its White House perpetrators, should be ashamed.
The Obama administration always confused their own political agenda with national security.
And what was their own political agenda? According to acclaimed journalist Daniel Greenfield, Rice and other Obama era cronies might very well have been motivated by a desire to protect the Muslim Brotherhood.
Susan Rice’s excuse for unmasking the names of top Trump officials in the Obama eavesdropping effort was that they were meeting with the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates.
The United Arab Emirates worried the Obama administration because they refused to be affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. As such to people sympathetic to the global vision of the Muslim Brotherhood, the UAE were traitors and troublemakers.
The UAE has become best known for being the first regional Muslim oil state to turn against the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire Arab Spring enterprise. It helped mobilize opposition to the Qatari agenda. The ultimate outcome of that effort was that Egypt was stabilized under a non-Islamist president and the Islamist takeover in Libya is looking rather shaky. The Saudi coalition against Qatar, the sugar daddies of Hamas, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, has its origins in that effort.
Obama made many deals with Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers that made no sense to the rest of the sane world. Think about the Iran deal.
When Obama Inc. spied on members of Congress before, it was to protect Iran. This time around, the gang that couldn’t spy straight was trying to protect the Muslim Brotherhood. The Iran Deal was never about stopping Iran’s nuclear program. It certainly does not do that. Nor was it ever meant to do it.
Instead the real goal of the Iran negotiations was a diplomatic arrangement with the Islamic terror state. The fruits of that arrangement can be seen from Beirut to Baghdad. They are written in blood and steel across Syria, Israel and Yemen. And that arrangement had to be protected at all costs.
And according to Greenfield’s research, these examples are only the tip of the Muslim Brotherhood/Obama admin iceberg.
The arrangement that Susan Rice was protecting by spying on top Trump officials was even older and dirtier. It goes back to Obama’s Cairo speech and the resulting bloody horrors of the Arab Spring.
Both times Obama Inc. was caught spying on American officials to protect its dirty deal with Islam.
Obama officials had spied on Americans to protect Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood. That’s more than a mere crime. It’s treason. Imagine if Watergate had been about the White House spying on Democrats for the KGB. That is the sheer full scope of what we appear to be dealing with here.
Both high-level eavesdropping incidents involve an effort by Obama Inc. to protect Islamist enemies.
This is just a report. But, it does make a lot of sense. A lot of the times Obama made weak deals, an individual or country connected with the Muslim Brotherhood profited. How do you explain that?
The Obama edition of Watergate wasn’t committed merely for domestic political gain. It was carried out for a reason that was encompassed in his address to the United Nations after the Benghazi massacre.“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
And why are we not more skeptical about that man protecting us from radical Islamic terror? That is not to suggest that the proverbial fox guarding the hen house is a Muslim, but it would hardly be surprising.
Image: New America