“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
To kill with at very close range,,,are you blind or just a liberal stupid?
The don’t need them, police are to protect if bayonets are need then you call the national guard.
Lmao you people believe anything on the web!!! I’ve been in and around police work for 30 years and have never ever ever seen an officer with a bayonet or heard of anyone training with one. Lol drink the kool aid if you want on this one bit it’s total BS.
Liberals have proven by outcome their failed policies. War on poverty, war on women, war on weather, war on gays, again, a low mentality addressing topics with a low IQ.
It would look better when they kill unarmed people if they were only stabbed instead of shot to death.
Good question
The best answer I can give, is they are fighting against 1000’s of rioters, they may need one! Just sayin!
With municipal budgets under strain since the 08 Wall Street Crash/Robbery the cost of ammo has become a concern. You can reduce ammo cost significantly by bayonetting people that walk while black or sell cigarettes on the street.
I saw Rand Paul at a congressional hearing ask why they needed bayonets! It is a FACT! He was told
“Idk, we’ll look into that!”
Couple snipers on tha roof wud have stopped terroist