“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Bayonents?-omg their dangerous enough withtheir nightsticks-maybe give some of those cops a big book with really rude comments in it and throw it at some of those bad guys (this comment made for humour) cops using bayonets IS not!
Whoever keeps ordering this stuff, they need to have their credit cut off..
Good question
For killin more people oorah
All that equipment should be in the hands of the local militia, not the police.
Against People in the Streets, Rock Throwers etc. Not to Worry Romans 12:19 My Back Up, and HE has Girls Friends who Like to Fight Rita’s , Katrina, Sandy’s Bayonets are Useless and Kissing Bugs while their Dreaming at Night.
Well obama declared america a warzone did he not? Now he is arming his soldiers is he not? The only thing missing is proper declaration against the american people.
Maybe to fight the horrid assault on grammar perputuated by the author of that article in it’s title ?
SO TRUE
Very good question and why accept the answer and not do something to change it —