We were told the matter was urgent. That the president represented a danger to the country while he remained in office. That removing him was a solemn and necessary task. That he, among other alleged offenses, obstructed justice. That “politics” had nothing to do with it.
Now the leader of these same Democrats who have made these claims has put matters on hold. Turns out it's not President Trump who is obstructing justice, it's Mrs. Pelosi who is blatantly trashing the Constitution, obstructing justice, and turning the tragedy of impeachment into a complete farce. It's her neck that should be in the judicial noose.
Not political, or so Mrs. Pelosi claims? That's a lie. The whole fraudulent mess is for political reasons. She knows when she turns matters over to the Senate that she loses any control as the impeachment will then be in the hands of the Republicans who can finally call the witnesses they wish.
So Nancy is trying to have it both ways. The Impeachment Show is not political when she is calling the shots, just when Republicans or President Trump have a voice. And this allegedly urgent matter on which the integrity of our republic supposedly depends has ground to a halt. This, courtesy of Mrs. Pelosi who, seeing almost certain defeat in the Senate, has decided to attempt to hold up the process — maybe for months.
It's not a strategy that will work. More than that, it's backfiring on the Democrats as Americans can see what really is going on. And we'll look at that more closely on the next page including problems Speaker Pelosi may be creating for herself.
Overall the writing could be a bit stronger.
“Turns out Mrs. Pelosi is the one who is now obstructing justice. And, wait for it… It’s for political reasons.”
Turns out is not very strong. The woman is committing seriously unconstitutional acts here, we should speak stronger.
“And she, her party, and their Impeachment Show deserve to be held up to ridicule.”
Only ridcule? Our audience wants her head. This communicates in a weak manner. We need to turn up the juice quite a bit!
Okay. Got home and made some changes. I recall this being an issue a few times a couple of years ago. I’ll work on it, but to be honest, I can’t tell much difference between the tone of yesterday’s article and today’s. Both of them should infuriate a liberal and give conservatives plenty to chew on.
It’s much better, stronger language that calls for action. You don’t see much difference? The words themselves, like noose, losing their seats, crimes, etc are stronger and you use them to call for action.
This is closer to the mark of how our readers feel, so it will read better to them.
Okay. Just got home from church. I’m a Saturday evening guy.
After writing an article I read it aloud to proof it for errors. I believe I will read it for content, seeing where my “normal” voice and language can be strengthened to make your readers more satisfied.
By the way, I don’t remember what I get paid to do these? That’s a heck of a way for me to take a job — not knowing the rate of pay.
Have a good evening, Craig
This particular crowd is and has always been quite ticked off at the government. So matching their emotional state is important.
$5 an article as always.
I’ll be throwing more comments your way so we get the most readership we can. It all boils down to shares and they will share if we push their buttons while giving good info