The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
Idiot!
But it is cool when it goes through a 6×6 at 125ft with out moving it
deer-hunt with bow, polticians and other crimminals hunt with machine guns
But they’re wonderful for hunting herds of wild boar. They’re also very useful at keeping a tyrannical government at bay
Yep I got a 30-06 for my deer hunting the AR-15 is for my Government in case they get outta hand.
The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting!
The right to bare arms has nothing what soever to do with hunting!
It cracks me up how people that are protected by people (with guns) have so much to say about what they think we don’t need for our personal protection.
We don’t need them for hunting deer we need them to protect ourselves from the corrupt government and people like you who support it
Its not about deer hunting fool!