The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
223 is a light round really. Isnt it?
Don’t need it for seer moron, it’s needed to keep the government at bay.
Read,the Constitution,. Omalley.don’t say anything about hunting does it..how about you stepping down from office .you don’t know enough to be representing anyone.
JD Haze, please read my remark. You are correct in that hunting hasn’t a —-ng thing to do with and neither does need!! !
Fidiot.
Has he ever asked a German Jew living in the 1930s why the 2nd Amendment is a good idea in a Democratic country.
This is the same idiot that tried to tax rain water runoff !
Comrade O’Malley.
What part of the second amendment does this clown not understand?
Jimmy Henrich It fires a 5.65 nato otherwise known as a .223 Winchester. Bullet diameter .223. @@ Cal.