In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
That miserable low life judge in Ohio should be
Impeached.
BS
Throw her out. Doesn’t she take an oath to support and defend it???
Welcome to the new liberal America is just great.
Alice, I think what the judge was trying to say was that people brought into her courtroom will not be allowed to make irrelevant statements quoting the constitution in an attempt to evade charges brought against them. Am sure the judge has enough knowledge of the Constitution to know what the defendants rights are. Just as officers of the law do not take note of suspects telling them that they know their rights when about to be arrested or questioned.
Now do we finally have that cleared up?
Off the bench you moron of a human bring
Stupid cow……………..
WTF
then refuse to acknowledge her perceived “authority” … and ignore her … on every level.
She should be fired as a judge and her oath of office. Traitor!