In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
What!!!!!!
What in the world another one being paid off!
that is a special kind of stupid
it is what our laws are based on and it is the law , that she swore to uphold
She should be impeached.ASAP
yep, 100%
She needs to be thrown off the bench
Wtf
She is a a damn nut job!
Their is a case currently that is being presided over by a judge named Anna Brown and the courtroom is in Portland, OR. She has said that in “HER” courtroom, the US Constitution will NOT be allowed and if anyone brings it up, she will throw them out of the courtroom. Are these the types of people we want presiding over anything in a courtroom? You CANNOT have the US Constitution in the courtroom? These “TERRORISTS” THAT ARE HOLDING JUSTICE HOSTAGE MUST BE REMOVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!