In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Fire the judge.
Remove her from the bench.
OK NOW SHE SHOULD BE FIRED SIMPLE AS THAT
BULL$#%&!@*. THIS JUDGE NEEDS TO GO BECAUSE OUR LAWS ARE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION
The people who live there should have a recall of the judge for not following the constitution.
Bailiff, please$#%&!@*her “honor” to the parking lot while the motion to recall her is allowed.
Shes Needs to be terminated!
pig
WTF???
LAW SUIT!!!!!