In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
How can a judge be a judge without the$#%&!@*Constitution!!!??? Has America gone completely insane!!??
Isn’t she sworn to uphold it?
Judge gets bag over he as &$#%&!@*beat heading for car…
She should be made to step down, immediately
Thanks for setting up some appeals. Gracias.
Why not it’s not being used in most cases…
Fire that judge she’s no good
Look what liberalism is doing to America. I pray Trump wins and removes all these Obama appointed liberal judges.
In the first place its not her court its the people’s furthermore she took an oath to uphold the constitution she should be removed at gun point if necessary
Sounds like a NWO judge… TrumPence/2016…. Keeping The Constitution ALIVE !!!