In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
And if the people allow it they are fools.
It’s not her court stupid bimbo
Tell the they are totally inappropriate and they are making a mockery of the law,! And walk out !!
” I swear to uphold the constitution…” Bull turkey !!!
Must be another$#%&!@*Liberal
She needs to go!
Pray tell what is wrong with knowing your rights and exercising them whether it be in a courtroom or when dealing with police? You stupid f**k
And she should be placed in jail for it!
The judge is bound by the constitution how can he or she obviously some liberal negate it in their court room
Disbar the idiot.