In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Than what did she study? God help us there goes are rights who goes before that judge. I think they are voted in I could be wrong, if so take her out.
If this ‘Judge’ is elected she needs to be VOTED OUT!!!
Excuse me!
Looks like she is putting herself out of a job with no law basis she is worthless
Throw her out.
Judge Brown in the Oregon case of the Bundy’s issued the same ruling the Constitution cannot be brought up. Her reasoning is that we are not lawyers and not qualified to interpret the Constitution. The founders wrote the Constitution with eighth grade education in mind so all could understand it it is written in English no interpretation needed..
Another liberal piece if$#%&!@*judge
She should be removed from the bench if this is true.
And thats a judge too.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This judge needs to be removed from the bench.