In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Chuck Lupo , unfortunately I have to do that every day. However, I have to admit it does become a chore having to explain to, what I consider retards, anything that requires thinking above the minimum thought process. Have a nice day.
What?
Judges have been throwing the Constitution out for their own opinions for centuries now… and you wonder why people are fed up the the DOJ?
More democrat corruption!
Get this idiot off the bench as soon as possible.
How the h—- are they going to have court if you can’t mention the construction? ?? AMERICA IS GOING DOWN FAST AND STUPID PEOPLE ARE THE REASON WHY! !!!!! FREAKING CRYBABY MAKE EVERYTHING FAIR AND EQUAL FOR EVERYONE ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO WON’T GET OFF THEIR BUTTS AND WORK!!! LAZY GOOD FOR NOTHING PEOPLE
UN-AMERICAN!!!!
I don’t believe HE will ever let evil win.
Throw the judge out !! This is America!
She should be disbarred and removed from the bench immediately!!!