In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
??????? Huh
B******t
SHE SHOULD BE DISBARRED! !!!!!
What?
She needs to be removed immediately if this is true
F**K HER THEN TELL HER TO LEAVE THIS COUNTRY CUZ IT WAS FOUNDED BY PEOPLE WHO WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT WENT INTO EFFECT IN 1789 !!!!!!!
state gvt don’,t de ide federal cases.
Must be a liberal who does not respect the constitution or the rule of law
She should be disparaged.
I don’t believe this story,