In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I believe she can’t do that,
Then YOU have NO Place being a Judge !
As Americans we live our constitution always have and always will she needs to be relieved of her duties as a judge she must be an Obama nut case
Wth ???
this sounds like something the state of ohio would do. can’t stand that state
JUDGE IS SOOOO WRONG.
Judges have too much power if this is the kind of ‘Bans’ they choose! The constitutions is why you have a JOB!!
Should loose her licence for life.
KICK THE TRAITOR OUT . SHE DOESN’T BELONG ASANY JUDGE OANY COURT IN THE U.S.A.
Recall or hang out to dry!The Constitution is the law of the land. If she refuses to comply, you take it to the next court up in the state of Ohio and onto your state’s supreme court. Themask the bar to have her removed fron the bench.