In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
OMG! And this just is allowed to pass judgment on someone else? Crazy! Unamerican! Unconstitutional!
GET RID OF THE JUDGE
I tell you, if this is true she needs go be in jail. All this type of$#%&!@*is beyond the pale as they say. Would a judge be this ignorant. It could get her kicked off the bench.
That judge has to go!
Get her off of the bench. Now.
This is b******t post!!!!!
Her job is to uphold the Constitution…period.
how can you have a court without the constitution ?…
What??? They need to throw out the judge
Ja,ja,nå vil noen kaste loven ut fra rettslokalene,nå er galskapen kommet langt.