In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I would hope the Constitution would be allowed in any courtroom!!!!!!
Throw her$#%&!@*out! Traitor!!!
What the hell?
Can’t be an American judge
Is she a muslim?
Then she needs to be thrown out of the court room. She is to uphold the constitution
The Russians do not need to nuke us, we are doing it to ourselves…as predicted by Khrushchev
A liberal judge, naturally!
Four of our current Supreme Court Justices have openly said they have no regard for our Constitution. Imagine what just one more person who hates our Constitution would do to the Institution. If their job is to judge the Constitutionality of laws & to apply the Constitution in cases brought before it – THEN JUST WOULD WOULD THE THE PURPORE OF THIS BODY – if not to serve as President so directed?
She needs to be ban, fired! If this is true.