In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Oh yea we cant have that nasty constitution thing in a court of law
F**k her this is America
This alledged judge must be a kangaroo because this sounds like a Kangaroo Court. So the Constitution can’t be mentioned even the this idiot violated the Constitution…….so are they making the law up as they go along? Didn’t the alledged judge take an oath of office? I know the Constitutioin was mentioned in the oath. Well……it’s truth…..you can’t fix stupid!
Time for this judge to be disbarres
This travesty should be removed from the court by the citizens of this city.
PERIOD. IF SHE DOESN’T WANT THE CONSTITUTION SO BE IT…REMOVE HER.
What Muslim p o s was that.
Throw her$#%&!@*off the bench and into jail…all this stupid$#%&!@*because of Obama what a @%@&#&# joke
Take her law liscence away
Can you say disbarred!
This is another POS that needs to be in jail.