In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
ok GOD… act on behalf of all your kids.
You’re FIRED$#%&!@*
She needs to be disbarred then
Than that$#%&!@*needs to go!!
I hope that was sarcasm….
Throw that dumb idiotic. Judge the hell out from the court for being so fucking stupid !!
Fire this corrupt$#%&!@*!!!!!
Doe she mean,, the document from which her court derives?
She is no longer a judge. A judge can’t do her job without enforcing constitutional law. It has to be a part of the court. Like it. Or leave it.
Fire her this is America. Don’t like it move to mexico