In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
She should not be on the bench
Oooohh a gag order, that’s unconstitutional judge, it goes against my right to free speech. Oh it’s not your court is it? It belongs to the people but you can be a sitting Judge there, how’s that?
What
These are not JUDGES!! Wake up they are PLANTS SITTING ON THE BENch
County courts are involved with state laws.
Put her$#%&!@*in jail
FIRE HER!!!!!!!!! SHE CANT MAKE UP HER OWN RULES!!!!!!!
I would do it on purpose
Remove thiscommunist from the bench, now!!!!!
Cut all the bs. This judge doesn’t need dealt with by the bar association. A short rope and a tall tree is a better solution if you all me