In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Simple solution is to submit the Constitution as supporting evidence, refer to the evidence as required. $#%&!@*this judge and her traitorist attitude, replace her in the next election.
I hope this isn’t true!
She has no business in being a judge
Throw her Azz out!!!!
ITS TIME FOR THAT JUDGE TO BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.
Throw the idiot out.
NIGRO JUDGE ?
Then this judge who is supposed to uphold the Constitution should lose her fucking job
WTF. This judge needs to be de-benched.
Sounds to me like they need a new judge and THIS judge needs about 10 years of prison meditation!!