In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Ohio Judge exposes criminal intent to the world , if this is the case .
And people have inalienable rights the Constitution is there to put restraint on government not on the people
For people who believe the judge is wrong you are wrong you need to read more Constitution is only in common law
She needs removed form the bench and thrown in jail for ignoring the core responsibility of her position. She is obviously a disgrace to our country and to the people whom she has taken an oath to protect through the courts and her position.. Fucking disgusting and deplorable behavior
Her job is protecting that.
throw her out of her own court…this is unconstitutional in itself.
Well we need to fire this Judge.
Sandi Evagues Zancha, just because the government now ignores it, it does not mean we don’t have one. Trump will restore that also….
take her out of office!
Put her out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!