In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
The LAWS of the US CONSTITUTION is what gives the Judge the position and what authority he or she has to ACT within that LAW. The Judge does not have the authority to act outside of the law of the US Constitution nor the authority to create a law. This is a criminal act against the laws of the US Constitution that ALL laws must comply to.
Then she does not need to be a judge
What!! Then she’s no judge
Is she crazy???
That judge can go$#%&!@*herself. She’s probably a liberal p.o.s.
Its a maritime admiralty court they do not go by the Constitution
Must be an Obummer fan! Vote Trump
You have a lot more reading to do
Has she forgotten it is not her court? It is the people’s court that she presides over! Witout the Constitution ‘her’ court is meaningless.
Common law is the law of the land and you are way behind in what they can and cant do