In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I’d have to put that to the test. Get rid of this power mad traitor.
UnAmerican !
Then it isn’t a legal court. Find some rope and a tree, and boycott the school that gave that dumbass a law degree;
Ugh
That sounds unconstitutional to me and should not hold up in court.
Get rid of this idiot judge!!!
Spoken like a true liberal Anti American that should be put into jail!
The judge should be jailed. How sick is this. Courts are to uphold the law, not ignore it.
Dumb bastard
i think that judge just violated the law and the constitution. you know this judge can be remove from the bench now, hello OHIOIANs she can be removed.