In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
So.. What side are you on? I believe we need to stand up and defend our constitutional rights. The right to freedom of speech, freedom of religion and the right to defend myself against all enemies. Period
Ya know, I never thought I would suggest there was any legitimate place for a political re-education center in the USA, but, this judge . . . maybe we should name one after her.
What a liberal dictator judge who should be supporting the Constitution.
Sorry Judge; bit there ate some things you can’t do. One of which is taking my right ad an American to BE an American. As far as I’m concerned, you can die and go to Hell!
“Common sense is a flower that does not grow in everyone’s garden”! This was on a church message board in my city just yestetday! ( Manteca,CA).
Ohio judge,Is this one of those that John Kasich appointed?
So many socialist and communists have made themselves into our court systems and government positions …
That’s b******t she should be disbarred from the bench.
Huh…. Remove this unamerican p.o.s.
SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!