In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Escort this nit wit out of my country. constitution constitution constitution constitution constitution constitution constitution….
These “judges” need to be looked at…real close.
Another sold out stupid
What ! Get rid that dam liberal asshole
Our whole system is based on the constition ,is she brain dead?
take it to a higher court and then sue the judge and prosecutorfor infringement of his constitutional rights
thst judge is a criminsl traitor idiot
Our country is going to hell fast !!!
Then she herself should be held in contempt, because she took an oath at one time or another to uphold American laws!
we need reform in our justice system- judges have too much power and nobody can confront them. They forgot they are people servants not the other way around. We need some commissions from lay citizens which will have the power to control such issues.