In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Down with the judges who violate the Constitution. Just like the dumb ‘ss who let the muslims go scott free when he had violated a 14 year old female The judge said that perp did it because of his upbringing. WOW Do you think if my parents had robbed banks and I did the same thing, I would have gotten a free pass because if was in my background LOL
kick her out next election.
someone needs to remind her of something called freedom of speech.
SHE NEEDS TO BE FIRED…………..
first off its not her court period its the peoples court and its founded on the constitution she should be jailed now. for treason to the constitution
cant they stick up for them also. like the police investigating the police and i have proof
Get rid of this fool!!!!
C**p
—-She needs to be Fired.
I declare this judge is a @unt.