In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Unconstitutional
RECALL THE SLAG! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Throw that hater out of the court and the country!
You have that right Hal
can you say appeal??
I would tell the court where they could stick it
Agree Hal Goltz
Demacrat bitch
If it wasn’t for the constitution she wouldn’t have a job!
Terrible.