In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
SHE SHOULD BE DISBARRED SHE IS A JUDGE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION
the$#%&!@*can’t do that legally
wtf Treason
B******t!! The constitution is the law!!
What laws are the judges using now if not the constitution?
Time for the judges in our court system to be FIRED!!!
This judge should be disbarred.
Disbar her!
Sounds to me that lobbying is panhandling!!! All lobbyest need to be tried for panhandling!!!!
Off the bench…..