In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Take the DA off of the bench. It cannot do that. There is no legal basis for that DA ban.
Another traitor rearing their ugly head
There isn’t a Constitution any more. Doesn’t anyone see that?
So we have a judge who is sworn to uphold something that can’t be mentioned? Isn’t this grounds for removal from the bench?
Then drag her butt off the bench. Did she forget what country she’s in or is she a relative of Obamas?
That judge should be disbarred as soon as she said ban and Constitution in the same sentence
Wow just wow
Dis bar her
Hahaha wow.
This is why it’s important to have a republican president to stop the liberals agenda.