In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Fire that stupid$#%&!@* Lesbion?
she needs to re removed.
the treasonous judge…….
Your honor, you do not have any such authority. Denial of the Constitution makes you the accused in this case.
BS
Sound to me like an illegal court, she should be disbarred… Must be a Bernie supporter!!!
WAKE THE HELL UP SHEEPLE!
If the law being unconstitutional could stir up problems, then there’s a problem with the law not abiding by the Constitution. To say that the jurors would be confused is not an excuse. This is our judicial system???
WHATEVER IT TAKES!
Sans Countitution there would BE no court.