In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
How can you ban mentioning the law of the land in a court of law of all places – I thought the courts were supposed to be all about upholding the law and now you can’t even mention it.
This Woman needed to be recalled NOW!!
I’m offended! Ok. I said it. This means that she has to be removed at once or there will be riots in the street, burning and pillaging, and now I get my own bathroom, right? Or maybe not. Maybe I’ll just get labeled as a judge-o-phobic, bigot racist. Oh well…
this is part of what is wrong in our country…if the judge can be voted out get them out of their seat!
Fire her
Get rid of that judge
You get what you vote for .
What exactly does she think she’s THERE for????? If you don’t like your job…then QUIT!!!!!
ILLEGAL
Fool.