In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
remove this un-American judge…..what has happened to our judiciary?
ah, unbelievable, the law if the land banned in court? so, what laws are permited in this kangaroo court?
Unless a defendant is AN ILLEGAL ALIEN, no judge has a RIGHT, THEIR COURTROOM OR NOT, to deny ANY CITIZEN from using the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION to defend themselves or others or their actions.
Disbar her, just like the Clinton’s and Obamas.
Personally I don’t care what your placing yourselves United Highly Above The Law or just Always above do.
You have NO permission, Power or International Authority over ME!
Yo$#%&!@*hole. All your judgements are suppose to be bassed on the constitution. She should be disbarred.
That judge should be arrested
She needs replaced soon as possible, sue her
Ummmmmmmm wow
Like the constitution ever meant anything in a court of law..No freedom of speech by contempt of court,order in the court etc..A false religion of false gods by Authority violating the separation of church and and state,violating everyone’s freedom of religion..trying people who were enslaved by arrest,fines,detainment,and more illegally under the 13th amendment..When did the constitution exist in courts?