In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I’m with you brother I’m sorry for the ones who are prepared the enemy is in the fence line!!
Probably will be a Clinton Supreme Court pick.
She needs to be removed from the bench has no reason to be there idf she doesnt accept the constitution
America under Obama has been destroyed
how is it possible she could even be a judge it’s mind boggling
She shouldn’t be sitting on the bench. Who put her there?
She’s an$#%&!@*hole and needs to be unseated!! But that figures for Ohio!!
She dammed sure doesn’t need to be a judge in America anymore. Traitors to the United States of America.
Spot on!
Someone should ban her corrupt$#%&!@*along with the rest of the corrupt politicians , and judges , and law makers , and the law enforcements that uphold these unconstitutional laws