In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I meant cases.
Wait, I though laws and judicial decisions derived from out constitution. That’s like going to the BMV and then telling people don’t say a word about driving in this establishment. That’s wiping your butt before you p**p, it just don’t make sense.
Do what????
Fire the traitor of the oath of office right now.
Out with that judge !!!
WTF !!! Insanity rules in this country…OMG!!!
The law is based on the Constitution, apparently the judge needs to go.
Boot her out and send her out of our country!
She should be disbarred !!!
Impeach her.