In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Remove her
Yep
She should be fired, or kicked off the bench or what ever it is that you do to a judge that is not fit to be in a court.
Remove her from the bench. She is in violation of her oath because of this.
Mark Dunn Try English!
Stupid
Violation of first ammenment!!!! This judge should be disbared!!!!!!!!
Remember this is Ohio, land of the frozen brains.
THROW her out the dooor. wide one so her fat head will go through.
The Constitution is not valid in Admiralty Law.