In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
the document she was sworn to uphold?
Ok
That’s insane!
That’s unconstitutional.
Is that legal?
put him on leave.now ,now ,mow.
That judge needs to be removed from the bench and disbarred immediately!!!!!
Any judge that acts like that can have grievances filed against them to the state judiciary system-They can be removed from position with enough complaints filed
The court is not Hers and if she is unable to administer justice under the Constitution she needs to be removed immediately.
Isn,t this America,don,t we have a constitution?